Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistani cricket team in Australia in 1992–93

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani cricket team in Australia in 1992–93

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NEVENT. Störm (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are articles on touring sides for each cricket season. I don't have access to news archives but there would almost certainly be coverage of Pakistan's tour of Australia at that time in national newspapers (there always is), so the claim of non-notability is simply not true. Another option which would be a valid alternative to deletion would be a merge or redirect to 1992–1993 Australian cricket season but that article currently doesn't exist. So as not to undo the good work of cricket editors here I see why this article can't be kept pending that being created. Again, another instance where deletion is a lazy option. Deus et lex (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. And again, I'll say what I said on other similar nominations. We have a complete series of articles on the official cricket tours, and because there is a complete series, readers (remember them?) can find their way around easily. What is the encyclopaedic merit in seeking to destroy that? Johnlp (talk) 12:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 1992–93 Australian Tri-Series which is what should have been done in 2007 when this article was created. This was not a tour in any traditional sense of the word, but a tournament. The warm up games warrant a sentence, at best, in the tai-series article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to 1992–93 Australian Tri-Series. Matches on this trip were organised around this tournament. Does not meet criteria for a standalone article. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not a clear consensus on to keep or to delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HawkAussie (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if it's likely that sources can be found to expand article. Otherwise merge with 1992-93 Australian Tri-Series. Bibliopole5795 (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Again relisted to enable a consensus regarding outcome to emerge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 06:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 1992–93 Australian Tri-Series as per Blue Square Thing, above. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.